Skip to content

SELF-GRADING REFLECTION: TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

1 year ago

407 words

In my technical description final draft, I explained the importance and roles of the PlayStation 5 controller for people, especially gamers. In this draft, all required genre elements listed on the assignment sheet were present, the cover page formatted in APA, table of contents, definition, overview, components, explanation, visuals, conclusion, and references.

I think that the work done in these parts of the draft is decent based on what the assignment sheet explained to us. I see that I went into the smallest details describing the controller in the components part, explained every role of every button of it in the explanation part, and showed labeled photos and its shape from different angles. However, I was able to find out later that there is some added material in the explanation and components part I could’ve avoided but they didn’t affect my work in a massive way.

Moreover, I think that the references and citations could be done in a better way due to some misunderstanding from the prompt, where I just mentioned links and sources of my information at the end of the draft in the references part.

Concerning tone and language, I see that my work was written in simple English language where I let the idea reach the reader immediately without thinking or analyzing what I just said. It was so easy and simple to comprehend my description of the PS5 controller because I avoiding getting into unnecessary details that may complicate the reader’s mind. Nevertheless, I don’t mind using some better and harder vocabulary next time to give some taste to the writing.

I think that everything I wrote was at least 98% sure because I read everything I searched for while working on my draft, and I know for a fact that all this is true because I have a PS5 and I know the smallest details about it, so I would’ve known if what I wrote was wrong or not.

I admit that for me there was not much to review from the first draft to the final draft because the template was completely correct, but I can tell that there were several mistakes with language and grammar I could fix and I did.

The submission of this assignment was before the deadline which makes it safe from any deduction of grades. Overall, I give myself an 80/100 for this assignment for neat work, coordination of ideas and important details.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar